In the almost three years of this weekly endeavor, my main objective has been to initiate a discussion in the setting of your choice. Whether the dining room table with friends and family or the lunch room with coworkers, without the exchange of ideas and exploration of possibilities there is little hope for progress.
With that in mind, today I ask questions, but offer no answers. I leave that to you, dear readers, in the hope that you’ll reintroduce or at least reinvigorate the passion in your conversations. Expect nothing but question marks from here.
How can Congress pass laws that do not apply to its members?
Why do we, the voters, consider only two parties when choosing our elected representatives? Is there a substantive difference any longer?
How can we advance as a society when more and more of our citizens are left behind economically, intellectually, and medically?
How much money is enough?
What is an acceptable unemployment rate?
What is a fair tax?
How do we win the war on drugs?
Should public service (politics) be a career?
If hetero, Is gay sex cheating? And, if gay, is hetero sex cheating?
Should there be a mandatory two year national service commitment for all?
Do corporations have a morale responsibility to society? If not, should they?
Is government oversight necessary to ensure a clean environment, safe drugs, or untainted food?
Does the fact that America is the only industrialized country not providing a level of health care to its citizens mean that the rest of the industrialized world is socialistic?
If you regard your life as a success, did you succeed without help?
If you regard your life as a failure, is there someone else to blame?
Is voting for the winner more important than voting for principle?
Should election day be expanded to encompass several days? If so, how many and which ones?
Should there be a specified campaign season?
Should there be a specified Christmas season?
Is the Post Office becoming obsolete?
Are e-cards as personal as traditional ones?
Which has more control over our daily lives: the President or Congress?
Are children more undisciplined or are parents more permissive?
Does a citizen have a real-world need for an assault rifle?
How is “special interest group” defined and what makes up the membership?
Are wars necessary? If so, how is winning a war defined?
Does the TSA make air travel safer?
Should government workers be forbidden from unionization? If so, how is “government” defined?
Should strikes be outlawed?
Which is more important: convenience or accomplishment?
Who should provide seed money for new, unproven technologies?
Do computers, smart phones, etc. control us or do we control them?
Would you rather text, email, talk on the phone, or meet face-to-face?
Where do the bullets go when shot in the air by rejoicers?
Wow! It’s amazing what comes to mind when only considering the Q’s. I’m sure that some A’s will crop up in the various conversations we find ourselves daily. While the particular answer may be meaningful, even more important is the dialogue that brings it about. Notice the rise in heart rate and how good you feel when moving beyond requisite small-talk? Have fun and let me know what answers you find.
No comments:
Post a Comment